Page 2 of 2

Re: woohoo site up and running?

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:42 pm
by oldfish
But I still don't understand what it is you think I have copied.

Re: woohoo site up and running?

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:56 pm
by vince.
oldfish wrote:But I still don't understand what it is you think I have copied.
Jim, like I said, not a big deal but if you wish to continue with this, does this not sound familiar.

This is a quote from you " Corrected info on John Law posted by someone on the internet a year or so back and no longer available at that place. Luckily I printed it for my own info". By that place you meant L&M because if you wish, I can go on to quote more direct lines you took from a post on this site.

Re: woohoo site up and running?

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 5:25 pm
by oldfish
OK. If that is an illegal thing to do then I can only reiterate my previous advance apology.

Re: woohoo site up and running?

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:05 pm
by vince.
oldfish wrote:OK. If that is an illegal thing to do then I can only reiterate my previous advance apology.
Like I said Jim, it's no big deal, can't see why you can't leave it alone. We all copy from the Internet, but let's not try to belittle L&M by calling it "that place", take from it & then deny it. Being rude is one thing, denying it is another.