Newell spelling

Newell Lures
Post Reply
aussbasstony
Guru
Guru
Posts: 937
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:47 pm
Location: australia

Newell spelling

Post by aussbasstony » Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:02 pm

While i was de hooking my lures in the display cabinet i noticed two of the Kadaitcha's were spelt differently ??? I assume that it does not matter !

Still a beautifull lure regardless if they forgot to cross the "T" and dot the "I"'s thumbsupsmilie

How many sizes were made in this model anyone know ???
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Jigmaster
Guru
Guru
Posts: 564
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Newell spelling

Post by Jigmaster » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:42 pm

Spelling was not Peter's great strength (there are a few lure makers this applies to). They are both Peter's lures.

I believe that there are now 6 regognised sizes - but I only own two myself.
Image

User avatar
simon bruce
Master
Master
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:31 pm
Location: Perth W.A

Re: Newell spelling

Post by simon bruce » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:43 pm

Frank, the luremakers have an excuse for poor spelling but as a "regognised" writer on lures...tsssk tsssk lol
Last edited by simon bruce on Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Jigmaster
Guru
Guru
Posts: 564
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Newell spelling

Post by Jigmaster » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:45 pm

Spelling was not Peter's great strength (there are a few lure makers this applies to). They are both Peter's lures.

I believe that there are now 6 recognised sizes - but I only own two myself.
Image

Jigmaster
Guru
Guru
Posts: 564
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Newell spelling

Post by Jigmaster » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:46 pm

You funny man Simon!! Remember the Western Australian memory!! lol
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Newell Lures”